Keio University

Subaru Tomori: Visiting the Dawn of Japanese Logo Marks

Publish: April 11, 2025

Writer Profile

  • Subaru Tomori

    Other : WriterOther : First-Class Intellectual Property Management Skills Technician

    Keio University alumni

    Subaru Tomori

    Other : WriterOther : First-Class Intellectual Property Management Skills Technician

    Keio University alumni

What was Japan's first registered trademark?

A chef who has accidentally cut off his index finger with a kitchen knife stares resentfully at the wound. On the cutting board in front of him lies the severed tip of his finger—this eccentric design is the memorable logo mark that became the first trademark registered in our country in 1885 (Figure 1).

Figure 1: The "Yomeiko" mark, which became Registered Trademark No. 1 in 1885.

This is the mark for "Yomeiko," an ointment for wounds sold since the Edo period. The design conveys the message, "Even with a major injury like this, you'll be fine if you apply this medicine" (regardless of whether an ointment could truly help a severed finger).

While such single-panel comic-like illustrations stood out among the many family-crest-style logo marks of the time, it was a common approach for medicines and cosmetics. This was related to the literacy rate of the general public at the time. In an era when not everyone could read well, businesses needed to use illustrations to show consumers what their products were for and in what situations they should be used.

As a result, medicine logo marks of that era often featured designs that might seem gloomy today, depicting injuries or illnesses such as "cutting a finger" or "back pain." This is the exact opposite of today's supplements and health foods, which often use design elements to evoke "vitality" or "recovery."

The mark of a man laughing with his internal organs exposed

A representative logo mark of that time using a similar approach is the anatomical diagram mark for "Isan" (Figure 2). The illustration of a "man with his stomach and intestines exposed" was, of course, intended to visually explain in a straightforward way that this was a "gastrointestinal medicine." The design, likely based on medical books brought from the West, is strangely realistic and grotesque. The trademark owner, Nobuyoshi Ota, was the founder of today's Ohta's Isan.

Figure 2: The first registered trademark (1885) for the gastrointestinal medicine "Ohta's Isan," which drew attention with its grotesque design.

As expected, this was received as a curiosity even by the townspeople of the time. The company's history reflects, "It is true that it gave the general public a 'creepy' impression, but on the other hand, it helped establish an unforgettable image as 'Ohta's Isan of the anatomical diagram'" (Reflections on a Hundred Years of Ohta's Isan, p. 66).

However, because this "Isan" became popular, the "anatomical diagram mark" sparked a boom and gave birth to many followers. Logo marks with exposed internal organs were released one after another by latecomers, and the influence remained until the Showa era. Looking back with today's sensibilities, it seems like a somewhat bizarre movement.

The need to exclude counterfeits and its limits

"Illustrated Encyclopedia of Edo and Meiji Logos: Looking Back at Corporate Marks Through Registered Trademarks" (Sakkusha) is an encyclopedia featuring a selection of logo marks from over 50,000 registered during the Meiji period since the enforcement of the Trademark Ordinance (current Trademark Act) in 1884. It includes marks that capture the design perspectives of the Edo to Meiji periods, those with historical anecdotes, and those symbolizing the industries of the time.

While writing, I researched a vast number of trademark gazettes recording the logo marks of businesses of various industries and sizes from that time, which led to several interesting realizations. Let me introduce a few of them.

For many businesses in the Meiji period, the purpose of trademark registration was clearly to "exclude counterfeits." This was an era when mechanisms for protecting intellectual property were insufficient compared to today, and awareness of respecting it was also thin. Countermeasure against counterfeits was a pressing common issue for successful businesses, and many industries were eagerly waiting for the start of the trademark registration system.

Even so, one of the realizations—and an interesting part of the trademark system—is that it was impossible to completely prevent the appearance of "similar trademarks" like the anatomical diagram marks that imitated Ohta's Isan. The Trademark Ordinance at the time provided penalties not only for the forgery of registered trademarks but also for the use of "trademarks confusingly similar to registered trademarks." However, if a trademark was "similar but not to a confusing degree," it did not constitute trademark infringement.

The purpose of the trademark system is to guarantee that the source (the manager, such as the seller) of products bearing the same trademark is always the same, thereby ensuring a certain level of quality and protecting the credit inherent in that trademark. Therefore, it stands to reason that similar marks that can be distinguished as different from the start fall outside the scope of trademark rights.

This remains the same in the legal principles of the current Trademark Act, and "how similar is confusingly similar and thus 'out' (infringement)" is still often a subject of dispute and debate today. However, unlike today when many businesses act as models, in the early days of the trademark system, it was not at all uncommon for enterprising latecomers to challenge pioneers with "similar trademarks."

A "battle of wits" over trademarks with latecomers

For example, against the sake brand "Ozeki," which was born in 1884 and registered as a trademark the following year, a counterfeit trademark called "Yokozuna" with almost the same design appeared in 1904 (Figures 3 and 4). By using "Yokozuna" to rival "Ozeki," the similar product appeared to be of a higher grade. One cannot help but be both appalled and impressed by such criminal intelligence.

Figure 3: The first registered trademark of the sake manufacturer "Ozeki." Derived from the highest rank of sumo wrestlers in 1885.
Figure 4: A registered trademark for a similar product that appeared in 1904. "Yokozuna" began to be used as a wrestler rank in 1890.

At the same time, the thought crosses one's mind that if this was going to happen, "Ozeki" should have called itself "Yokozuna" from the start without being modest... But upon investigation, "Yokozuna" only began to be used as the highest rank for sumo wrestlers in 1890. When "Ozeki" was born, Ozeki was indeed the highest rank. For the Osabe family (now Ozeki Co., Ltd.), who brewed "Ozeki," both the new rank of "Yokozuna" and the appearance of similar products must have been unexpected events.

In addition to this, there were similar trademarks registered such as "Mitsuo Cider" (where rice stalks, not arrows, formed that shape) to rival "Mitsuya Cider," and variations of the crescent moon mark for Kao Soap with different facial expressions.

The original owners did not just sit idly by in these situations. In the late Meiji period, a method often used by legitimate businesses was to preemptively register "fake trademarks" themselves before latecomers could. The plan was to catch opportunistic similar products in their own net of trademark rights.

For example, Teikoku Kosen, the manufacturer and seller of "Mitsuya Cider" at the time, registered "Futatsuya" (two arrows), "Yotsuya" (four arrows), and "Itsutsuya" (five arrows) marks themselves, in addition to the "Mitsuya" (three arrows) mark.

However, there was no end to this approach, and it was nearly impossible to cover all similar variations. In fact, in 1910, the company allowed the appearance of a "Yatsuya" (eight arrows) mark by a latecomer. In this way, the records of trademark registrations show the traces of a thrilling, no-holds-barred "battle of wits" played out between businesses over similar logo marks.

Yukichi Fukuzawa behind the long-lived marks?

By the way, when researching the history of Meiji-era logo marks, one can find the names of famous entrepreneurs who contributed to Japan's modernization as the owners or creators of those trademark registrations. And standing frequently behind them was Yukichi Fukuzawa.

The illustration of the sacred beast "Kirin," which is still active today as the logo mark for Kirin Beer, has been used since 1889. The idea to adopt "Kirin" as a trademark came from Heigoro Shoda of the Mitsubishi zaibatsu. He is known as a student of Fukuzawa who also served as the President of Keio University.

The "M in a circle" logo mark of the major bookstore Maruzen has also remained unchanged since around 1870. The founder, Yuteki Hayashi, also studied under Fukuzawa, and the import and sale of Western books, which he started at Fukuzawa's suggestion, was the beginning of Maruzen.

The "Kincho" mark for mosquito coils and insecticides has also been passed down since around 1910. The founder, Eiichiro Ueyama, also studied under Fukuzawa, and the start of his business was receiving seeds of the Dalmatian chrysanthemum, the raw material for mosquito coils, from a US seed merchant through Fukuzawa's mediation.

In addition, Meiki Morita, the great-great-grandfather of Sony Group founder Akio Morita and a sake brewer in Owari Province, also had a close relationship with Fukuzawa. In his book "Jiji Shogen," Fukuzawa highly praised Meiki's quality improvements and innovations in the manufacturing process. The sake brand "Nenohi" of the Morita family, which solidified its reputation through these innovations, has also been passed down to this day.

Could it be that the logo marks of entrepreneurs who received the guidance of Yukichi Fukuzawa tend to be long-lived? Research into the logos of the Edo and Meiji periods seems to have no end.

*Affiliations and titles are as of the time this magazine was published.